You know, I was going to tell you that I may just take 2009 as a break from blogging. The pressure of a blog without fresh posts would dissipate just like that. But that was before I wrote my last post. I had underestimated the power of writing (and bread dough) to make my world feel right-side-up again. There is that quiet contemplation of organizing abstract thoughts into words that balances me, soothes me.
Not that I have to blog in order to write. Justification: (1) my blogging makes you happy (Dude, if it doesn’t, I suggest you stop reading me!), and (2) blogging gives me a little push to finish my thoughts coherently.
Then I read Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”. One of the first points Carr made was that he (and I, admittedly) read differently than ever, especially on the web. We skim. I skimmed Carr’s article before I decided to blog about it. And then I thought to myself: do any of my readers really read my posts in their entirety? It’s kind of a depressing thought that readers don’t savor my every word.
But back to the article.
“[W]hat the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation,” Carr says. Many of us have lost our ability to sink into a good book. A few pages may make us anxious for a change of pace. I wonder, too, if this skipping from activity to activity and from thought to thought has made us desire everything to be bold and flashy at athletic events, at church services, and on television. It’s as though if we aren’t distracted, we’ll get bored.
Carr seems to agree:
The Internet, an immeasurably powerful computing system, is subsuming most of our other intellectual technologies. It’s becoming our map and our clock, our printing press and our typewriter, our calculator and our telephone, and our radio and TV.
When the Net absorbs a medium, that medium is re-created in the Net’s image. It injects the medium’s content with hyperlinks, blinking ads, and other digital gewgaws, and it surrounds the content with the content of all the other media it has absorbed. A new e-mail message, for instance, may announce its arrival as we’re glancing over the latest headlines at a newspaper’s site. The result is to scatter our attention and diffuse our concentration.
Can I just admit that it feels warm and fuzzy to have someone who thinks like me, who is suspicious of this whole technological surge that revolves around the Internet? But, as Carr says, sure, “you should be skeptical of my skepticism.” Maybe Google-style research is mostly good. After all, reading books isn’t a natural, instinctual activity anyway. Maybe the way human brains process information can just change, and we’ll come out better on the other side.
But then again, I doubt it.
“If we lose those quiet spaces, or fill them up with ‘content,’ we will sacrifice something important not only in our selves but in our culture…. As we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial intelligence.”